Housing Sites

C.26 The following analysis is drawn from Durham County Council’s latest available SHLAA (Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2018 (Durham County Council, 2018e,f). When a more up-to-date SHLAA becomes available we will revise these details. It is noteworthy that, throughout Our Neighbourhood, there are student accommodation developments on land that would otherwise have been suitable for ‘normal’ residential units e.g. County Hospital, Chapel Heights, Kepier Court, Berendsen’s laundry.

Table C8: Housing sites in Durham County Council SHLAA 2018

Durham County Council’s Deliverable SHLAA 2018 sites

Housing capacity in SHLAA
2019

Completed
as at 01-04-2018

Remaining commitment
as at 01-04-2018

Sites under construction

4/DU/79 Mount Oswald

291

108

183

4/DU/128 Former Bus Depot, Waddington Street

19

14

5

4/DU/40
Potters Bank

22

20

2

4/DU/25 Former Johnston School Whinney Hill site

75

0

75

4/DU/19 Police Headquarters, Aykley Heads

217

62

155

Small sites total

15

4

11

Sub-Total

639

208

431

Sites approved but not yet started

24 The Avenue

12

0

12

Land at Kepier House, Gilesgate

35

0

35

Adj Providence House, Providence Row

6

0

6

Companions Club, Ainsley Street

9

0

9

Garages rear of Pimlico

4

0

4

Land at St Cuthberts House and Diamond Terrace

5

0

5

Magdalene Heights

10

0

10

Milburngate House

441

0

441

Mount Oswald

5

0

5

Sheraton House, Merryoaks

47

0

47

Small sites total

0

0

0

Sub-Total

608

0

608

TOTAL APPROVED SITES

1,247

208

608

Proposed new allocation in Preferred Options: Former Skid Pan, Aykley Heads

50

0

0

GRAND TOTAL

1,297

208

608

Note: Some of these developments have now (October 2018) been completed

C.27 There will, in addition, be ‘windfall’ sites. It is estimated that an additional 100 houses would become available from small ‘windfall’ sites over the period of the Plan. This figure is drawn from the emerging County Durham Local Plan.

C.28 If further houses become available for the long-term residents of Our Neighbourhood through the release of houses currently occupied by groups of students, this could amount to perhaps 500 over the Plan period.

THE CONSULTATIVE HOUSING WHITE PAPER, FEBRUARY 2017

C.29 The Government published a consultative Housing White Paper ‘Fixing Our Broken Housing Market’ (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2017) in February 2017 setting out ideas for increasing the production of new housing. The Government responded in March 2018 to the comments received (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, 2018). One of the initiatives in the White Paper is to introduce a standardised approach to assessing housing requirements. A total of 25,992 additional dwellings would be required in County Durham under the Government’s standardised methodology. Durham County Council has accepted this figure at the time of writing (October 2018).

C.30 Specific recognition is given in the Government response of March 2018 to the needs of neighbourhood plan preparation. Normally the local planning authority would provide a figure, derived from the relevant development plan. However, many development plans are out-of-date and of course do not use the proposed standardised methodology. The Government suggests that a simple pro-rata approach should be used: the population in the neighbourhood plan area as a proportion of the population of the whole local planning authority area, and this proportion applied to the total housing requirement. Our Neighbourhood’s population is 4% of the County Durham total, so 4% of 25,992 i.e. 1,040 new dwellings would be required. However, this approach would seem to produce an over-estimate given that half the population in Our Neighbourhood are University students whose accommodation is in Colleges, PBSAs (purpose built student accommodation) and HMOs (houses in multiple occupancy). The 9,700 non-student population is 2%of the County Durham total, and this proportion represents a need for 520 new dwellings by the year 2033. Accordingly, while accepting the County Council’s estimate, other ways of calculating requirement indicate a lower figure for which the existing approved sites are significantly already more than sufficient.

See also Population and Households

Next section: Appendix D: Assets in Our Neighbourhood

Tell us your views

Your name, but not your email address, will be published

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.